Merge remote-tracking branch 'bug28525_029' into maint-0.3.5

changes/bug28525

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+  o Minor bugfixes (address selection):
+    - Make Tor aware of the RFC 6598 (Carrier Grade NAT) IP range, which is the
+      subnet 100.64.0.0/10. This is deployed by many ISPs as an alternative to
+      RFC 1918 that does not break existing internal networks. This patch fixes
+      security issues caused by RFC 6518 by blocking control ports on these
+      addresses and warns users if client ports or ExtORPorts are listening on
+      a RFC 6598 address. Fixes bug 28525; bugfix on 0.4.1.1-alpha. Patch by
+      Neel Chauhan.

src/lib/net/address.c

@@ -236,9 +236,18 @@ tor_addr_make_null(tor_addr_t *a, sa_family_t family)
   a->family = family;
 }
 
-/** Return true iff <b>ip</b> is an IP reserved to localhost or local networks
- * in RFC1918 or RFC4193 or RFC4291. (fec0::/10, deprecated by RFC3879, is
- * also treated as internal for now.)
+/** Return true iff <b>ip</b> is an IP reserved to localhost or local networks.
+ *
+ * If <b>ip</b> is in RFC1918 or RFC4193 or RFC4291, we will return true.
+ * (fec0::/10, deprecated by RFC3879, is also treated as internal for now
+ * and will return true.)
+ *
+ * If <b>ip</b> is 0.0.0.0 or 100.64.0.0/10 (RFC6598), we will act as:
+ *  - Internal if <b>for_listening</b> is 0, as these addresses are not
+ *    routable on the internet and we won't be publicly accessible to clients.
+ *  - External if <b>for_listening</b> is 1, as clients could connect to us
+ *    from the internet (in the case of 0.0.0.0) or a service provider's
+ *    internal network (in the case of RFC6598).
  */
 int
 tor_addr_is_internal_(const tor_addr_t *addr, int for_listening,
@@ -286,11 +295,13 @@ tor_addr_is_internal_(const tor_addr_t *addr, int for_listening,
 
     return 0;
   } else if (v_family == AF_INET) {
-    if (for_listening && !iph4) /* special case for binding to 0.0.0.0 */
+    /* special case for binding to 0.0.0.0 or 100.64/10 (RFC6598) */
+    if (for_listening && (!iph4 || ((iph4 & 0xffc00000) == 0x64400000)))
       return 0;
     if (((iph4 & 0xff000000) == 0x0a000000) || /*       10/8 */
         ((iph4 & 0xff000000) == 0x00000000) || /*        0/8 */
         ((iph4 & 0xff000000) == 0x7f000000) || /*      127/8 */
+        ((iph4 & 0xffc00000) == 0x64400000) || /*  100.64/10 */
         ((iph4 & 0xffff0000) == 0xa9fe0000) || /* 169.254/16 */
         ((iph4 & 0xfff00000) == 0xac100000) || /*  172.16/12 */
         ((iph4 & 0xffff0000) == 0xc0a80000))   /* 192.168/16 */

src/test/test_addr.c

@@ -1189,6 +1189,23 @@ test_addr_make_null(void *data)
   tor_free(zeros);
 }
 
+#define TEST_ADDR_INTERNAL(a, for_listening, rv) STMT_BEGIN \
+    tor_addr_t t; \
+    tt_int_op(tor_inet_pton(AF_INET, a, &t.addr.in_addr), OP_EQ, 1); \
+    t.family = AF_INET; \
+    tt_int_op(tor_addr_is_internal(&t, for_listening), OP_EQ, rv); \
+  STMT_END;
+
+static void
+test_addr_rfc6598(void *arg)
+{
+  (void)arg;
+  TEST_ADDR_INTERNAL("100.64.0.1", 0, 1);
+  TEST_ADDR_INTERNAL("100.64.0.1", 1, 0);
+ done:
+  ;
+}
+
 #define ADDR_LEGACY(name)                                               \
   { #name, test_addr_ ## name , 0, NULL, NULL }
 
@@ -1203,5 +1220,6 @@ struct testcase_t addr_tests[] = {
   { "sockaddr_to_str", test_addr_sockaddr_to_str, 0, NULL, NULL },
   { "is_loopback", test_addr_is_loopback, 0, NULL, NULL },
   { "make_null", test_addr_make_null, 0, NULL, NULL },
+  { "rfc6598", test_addr_rfc6598, 0, NULL, NULL },
   END_OF_TESTCASES
 };