i think this doesn't actually affect anything, since linked conns usually don't impact buckets
@@ -2352,7 +2352,7 @@ loop_again:
if (n_read) {
/* Probably a no-op, but hey. */
- connection_buckets_decrement(linked, approx_time(), 0, n_read);
+ connection_buckets_decrement(linked, approx_time(), n_read, 0);
if (connection_flushed_some(linked) < 0)
connection_mark_for_close(linked);