|
@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ dirserv_load_fingerprint_file(void)
|
|
|
* If the status is 'FP_REJECT' and <b>msg</b> is provided, set
|
|
|
* *<b>msg</b> to an explanation of why. */
|
|
|
uint32_t
|
|
|
-dirserv_router_get_status(const routerinfo_t *router, const char **msg)
|
|
|
+dirserv_router_get_status(const routerinfo_t *router, const char **msg,
|
|
|
+ int severity)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
char d[DIGEST_LEN];
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -263,7 +264,8 @@ dirserv_router_get_status(const routerinfo_t *router, const char **msg)
|
|
|
if (msg) {
|
|
|
*msg = "Ed25519 identity key or RSA identity key has changed.";
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
- log_warn(LD_DIR, "Router %s uploaded a descriptor with a Ed25519 key "
|
|
|
+ log_fn(severity, LD_DIR,
|
|
|
+ "Descriptor from router %s has an Ed25519 key, "
|
|
|
"but the <rsa,ed25519> keys don't match what they were before.",
|
|
|
router_describe(router));
|
|
|
return FP_REJECT;
|
|
@@ -272,7 +274,8 @@ dirserv_router_get_status(const routerinfo_t *router, const char **msg)
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (KEYPIN_MISMATCH == keypin_check_lone_rsa(
|
|
|
(const uint8_t*)router->cache_info.identity_digest)) {
|
|
|
- log_warn(LD_DIR, "Router %s uploaded a descriptor with no Ed25519 key, "
|
|
|
+ log_fn(severity, LD_DIR,
|
|
|
+ "Descriptor from router %s has no Ed25519 key, "
|
|
|
"when we previously knew an Ed25519 for it. Ignoring for now, "
|
|
|
"since Tor 0.2.6 is under development.",
|
|
|
router_describe(router));
|
|
@@ -299,7 +302,7 @@ dirserv_would_reject_router(const routerstatus_t *rs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
res = dirserv_get_status_impl(rs->identity_digest, rs->nickname,
|
|
|
rs->addr, rs->or_port,
|
|
|
- NULL, NULL, 0);
|
|
|
+ NULL, NULL, LOG_DEBUG);
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (res & FP_REJECT) != 0;
|
|
|
}
|
|
@@ -308,13 +311,13 @@ dirserv_would_reject_router(const routerstatus_t *rs)
|
|
|
* (hex, no spaces), nickname, address (used for logging only), IP address, OR
|
|
|
* port and platform (logging only) as arguments.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
- * If should_log is false, do not log messages. (There's not much point in
|
|
|
+ * Log messages at 'severity'. (There's not much point in
|
|
|
* logging that we're rejecting servers we'll not download.)
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
static uint32_t
|
|
|
dirserv_get_status_impl(const char *id_digest, const char *nickname,
|
|
|
uint32_t addr, uint16_t or_port,
|
|
|
- const char *platform, const char **msg, int should_log)
|
|
|
+ const char *platform, const char **msg, int severity)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
uint32_t result = 0;
|
|
|
router_status_t *status_by_digest;
|
|
@@ -322,10 +325,9 @@ dirserv_get_status_impl(const char *id_digest, const char *nickname,
|
|
|
if (!fingerprint_list)
|
|
|
fingerprint_list = authdir_config_new();
|
|
|
|
|
|
- if (should_log)
|
|
|
- log_debug(LD_DIRSERV, "%d fingerprints, %d digests known.",
|
|
|
- strmap_size(fingerprint_list->fp_by_name),
|
|
|
- digestmap_size(fingerprint_list->status_by_digest));
|
|
|
+ log_debug(LD_DIRSERV, "%d fingerprints, %d digests known.",
|
|
|
+ strmap_size(fingerprint_list->fp_by_name),
|
|
|
+ digestmap_size(fingerprint_list->status_by_digest));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* missing some important security fixes too. Disable them. */
|
|
@@ -350,23 +352,22 @@ dirserv_get_status_impl(const char *id_digest, const char *nickname,
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (authdir_policy_badexit_address(addr, or_port)) {
|
|
|
- if (should_log)
|
|
|
- log_info(LD_DIRSERV, "Marking '%s' as bad exit because of address '%s'",
|
|
|
+ log_fn(severity, LD_DIRSERV,
|
|
|
+ "Marking '%s' as bad exit because of address '%s'",
|
|
|
nickname, fmt_addr32(addr));
|
|
|
result |= FP_BADEXIT;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!authdir_policy_permits_address(addr, or_port)) {
|
|
|
- if (should_log)
|
|
|
- log_info(LD_DIRSERV, "Rejecting '%s' because of address '%s'",
|
|
|
+ log_fn(severity, LD_DIRSERV, "Rejecting '%s' because of address '%s'",
|
|
|
nickname, fmt_addr32(addr));
|
|
|
if (msg)
|
|
|
*msg = "Authdir is rejecting routers in this range.";
|
|
|
return FP_REJECT;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
if (!authdir_policy_valid_address(addr, or_port)) {
|
|
|
- if (should_log)
|
|
|
- log_info(LD_DIRSERV, "Not marking '%s' valid because of address '%s'",
|
|
|
+ log_fn(severity, LD_DIRSERV,
|
|
|
+ "Not marking '%s' valid because of address '%s'",
|
|
|
nickname, fmt_addr32(addr));
|
|
|
result |= FP_INVALID;
|
|
|
}
|
|
@@ -422,9 +423,9 @@ authdir_wants_to_reject_router(routerinfo_t *ri, const char **msg,
|
|
|
int complain, int *valid_out)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
|
- uint32_t status = dirserv_router_get_status(ri, msg);
|
|
|
time_t now;
|
|
|
int severity = (complain && ri->contact_info) ? LOG_NOTICE : LOG_INFO;
|
|
|
+ uint32_t status = dirserv_router_get_status(ri, msg, severity);
|
|
|
tor_assert(msg);
|
|
|
if (status & FP_REJECT)
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
@@ -734,7 +735,7 @@ directory_remove_invalid(void)
|
|
|
uint32_t r;
|
|
|
if (!ent)
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
- r = dirserv_router_get_status(ent, &msg);
|
|
|
+ r = dirserv_router_get_status(ent, &msg, LOG_INFO);
|
|
|
router_get_description(description, ent);
|
|
|
if (r & FP_REJECT) {
|
|
|
log_info(LD_DIRSERV, "Router %s is now rejected: %s",
|