|
@@ -259,11 +259,12 @@ dirserv_load_fingerprint_file(void)
|
|
|
* identity to stop doing so. This is going to be essential for good identity
|
|
|
* security: otherwise anybody who can attack RSA-1024 but not Ed25519 could
|
|
|
* just sign fake descriptors missing the Ed25519 key. But we won't actually
|
|
|
- * be able to prevent that kind of thing until we're confident that there
|
|
|
- * isn't actually a legit reason to downgrade to 0.2.5. So for now, we have
|
|
|
- * to leave this #undef.
|
|
|
+ * be able to prevent that kind of thing until we're confident that there isn't
|
|
|
+ * actually a legit reason to downgrade to 0.2.5. Now we are not recommending
|
|
|
+ * 0.2.5 anymore so there is no reason to keep the #undef.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
-#undef DISABLE_DISABLING_ED25519
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+#define DISABLE_DISABLING_ED25519
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Check whether <b>router</b> has a nickname/identity key combination that
|
|
|
* we recognize from the fingerprint list, or an IP we automatically act on
|