|  | @@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -Changes in version 0.2.1.2-alpha - 2008-06-??
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +Changes in version 0.2.1.2-alpha - 2008-06-20
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |    o Major features:
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -    - New TestingTorNetwork option to allow adjustment of previously constant
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -      values that, while reasonable, could slow bootstrapping.  Implements
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -      proposal 135.  Patch from Karsten.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +    - New TestingTorNetwork option to allow adjustment of previously
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      constant values that, while reasonable, could slow bootstrapping.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      Implements proposal 135. Patch from Karsten.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |    o Major bugfixes:
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -    - If you have more than one bridge but don't know their keys,
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +    - If you have more than one bridge but don't know their digests,
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |        you would only learn a request for the descriptor of the first one
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |        on your list. (Tor considered launching requests for the others, but
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |        found that it already had a connection on the way for $0000...0000
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |        so it didn't open another.)
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -    - If you have more than one bridge but don't know their keys, and the
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -      connection to one of the bridges failed, you would cancel all
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -      pending bridge connections. (After all, they all have the same
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -      digest.)
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +    - If you have more than one bridge but don't know their digests,
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      and the connection to one of the bridges failed, you would cancel
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      all pending bridge connections. (After all, they all have the
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      same digest.)
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |    o Minor features:
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |      - Allow OpenSSL to use dynamic locks if it wants.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -    - When building a consensus do not include routers that are down.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -      This will cut down 30% to 40% on consensus size.  Implements
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +    - When building a consensus, do not include routers that are down.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      This will cut down 30% to 40% on consensus size. Implements
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |        proposal 138.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |      - In directory authorities' approved-routers files, allow
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |        fingerprints with or without space.
 | 
	
	
		
			
				|  | @@ -33,10 +33,11 @@ Changes in version 0.2.1.2-alpha - 2008-06-??
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |        would crash a dirserver if it did not already have a consensus.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |      - Clean up some macro/CPP interactions: some GCC versions don't like
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |        #if/#endif pairs inside macro arguments.  Fixes bug 707.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -    - When establishing a hidden service, introduction points that originate
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -      from cannibalized circuits are completely ignored and not included in
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -      rendezvous service descriptors. This might be another reason for delay
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -      in making a hidden service available. Bugfix on 0.2.0.14-alpha.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +    - When establishing a hidden service, introduction points that
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      originate from cannibalized circuits are completely ignored and not
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      included in rendezvous service descriptors. This might be another
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      reason for delay in making a hidden service available. Bugfix
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +      from long ago (0.0.9.x?)
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |    o Bootstrapping bugfixes:
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |      - Directory authorities shouldn't complain about bootstrapping
 |