|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
|
|
|
|
+Filename: 138-remove-down-routers-from-consensus
|
|
|
|
|
+Title: Remove routers that are not Running from consensus documents
|
|
|
|
|
+Version: $Revision$
|
|
|
|
|
+Last-Modified: $Date$
|
|
|
|
|
+Author: Peter Palfrader
|
|
|
|
|
+Created: 11-Jun-2008
|
|
|
|
|
+Status: Open
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+1. Overview.
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+ Tor directory authorities hourly vote and agree on a consensus document
|
|
|
|
|
+ which lists all the routers on the network together with some of their
|
|
|
|
|
+ basic properties, like if a router is an exit node, whether it is
|
|
|
|
|
+ stable or whether it is a version 2 directory mirror.
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+ One of the properties given with each router is the 'Running' flag.
|
|
|
|
|
+ Clients do not use routers that are not listed as running.
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+ This proposal suggests that routers without the Running flag are not
|
|
|
|
|
+ listed at all.
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+2. Current status
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+ At a typical bootstrap a client downloads a 140KB consensus, about
|
|
|
|
|
+ 10KB of certificates to verify that consensus, and about 1.6MB of
|
|
|
|
|
+ server descriptors, about half of which it requires before it will
|
|
|
|
|
+ start building circuits.
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+ Another proposal deals with how to get that huge 1.6MB fraction to
|
|
|
|
|
+ effectively zero (by downloading only individual descriptors, on
|
|
|
|
|
+ demand). Should that get successfully implemented that will leave the
|
|
|
|
|
+ 140KB compressed consensus as a large fraction of what a client needs
|
|
|
|
|
+ to get in order to work.
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+ About one third of the routers listed in a consensus are not running
|
|
|
|
|
+ and will therefor never be used by clients who use this consensus.
|
|
|
|
|
+ Not listing those routers will safe about 30% to 40% in size.
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+3. Proposed change
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+ Authority directory servers produce vote documents that include all
|
|
|
|
|
+ the servers they know about, running or not, like they currently
|
|
|
|
|
+ do. In addition these vote documents also state that the authority
|
|
|
|
|
+ supports a new consensus forming method (method number 4).
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+ If more than two thirds of votes that an authority has received claim
|
|
|
|
|
+ they support method 4 then this new method will be used: The
|
|
|
|
|
+ consensus document is formed like before but a new last step removes
|
|
|
|
|
+ all routers from the listing that are not marked as Running.
|
Nick Mathewson