Browse Source

Merge branch 'bug1184'

Nick Mathewson 14 years ago
parent
commit
c18bcc8a55
6 changed files with 47 additions and 6 deletions
  1. 9 0
      changes/bug1184
  2. 8 0
      doc/spec/tor-spec.txt
  3. 6 2
      src/or/circuitlist.c
  4. 0 4
      src/or/connection_or.c
  5. 23 0
      src/or/relay.c
  6. 1 0
      src/or/relay.h

+ 9 - 0
changes/bug1184

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+  o Minor bugfixes:
+    - Never relay a cell for a circuit we have already destroyed.
+      Between marking a circuit as closeable and finally closing it,
+      it may have been possible for a few queued cells to get relayed,
+      even though they would have been immediately dropped by the next
+      OR in the circuit.  Fix 1184; bugfix on 0.2.0.1-alpha.
+    - Never queue a cell for a circuit that's already been marked
+      for close.
+

+ 8 - 0
doc/spec/tor-spec.txt

@@ -597,6 +597,14 @@ see tor-design.pdf.
    cell to the next node in the circuit, and replies to the OP with a
    RELAY_TRUNCATED cell.
 
+   [Note: If an OR receives a TRUNCATE cell and it has any RELAY cells
+   still queued on the circuit for the next node it will drop them
+   without sending them.  This is not considered conformant behavior,
+   but it probably won't get fixed until a later version of Tor.  Thus,
+   clients SHOULD NOT send a TRUNCATE cell to a node running any current
+   version of Tor if a) they have sent relay cells through that node,
+   and b) they aren't sure whether those cells have been sent on yes.]
+
    When an unrecoverable error occurs along one connection in a
    circuit, the nodes on either side of the connection should, if they
    are able, act as follows:  the node closer to the OP should send a

+ 6 - 2
src/or/circuitlist.c

@@ -1124,8 +1124,10 @@ _circuit_mark_for_close(circuit_t *circ, int reason, int line,
     rend_client_remove_intro_point(ocirc->build_state->chosen_exit,
                                    ocirc->rend_data);
   }
-  if (circ->n_conn)
+  if (circ->n_conn) {
+    circuit_clear_cell_queue(circ, circ->n_conn);
     connection_or_send_destroy(circ->n_circ_id, circ->n_conn, reason);
+  }
 
   if (! CIRCUIT_IS_ORIGIN(circ)) {
     or_circuit_t *or_circ = TO_OR_CIRCUIT(circ);
@@ -1149,8 +1151,10 @@ _circuit_mark_for_close(circuit_t *circ, int reason, int line,
       conn->on_circuit = NULL;
     }
 
-    if (or_circ->p_conn)
+    if (or_circ->p_conn) {
+      circuit_clear_cell_queue(circ, or_circ->p_conn);
       connection_or_send_destroy(or_circ->p_circ_id, or_circ->p_conn, reason);
+    }
   } else {
     origin_circuit_t *ocirc = TO_ORIGIN_CIRCUIT(circ);
     edge_connection_t *conn;

+ 0 - 4
src/or/connection_or.c

@@ -1323,10 +1323,6 @@ connection_or_send_destroy(circid_t circ_id, or_connection_t *conn, int reason)
   cell.payload[0] = (uint8_t) reason;
   log_debug(LD_OR,"Sending destroy (circID %d).", circ_id);
 
-  /* XXXX It's possible that under some circumstances, we want the destroy
-   * to take precedence over other data waiting on the circuit's cell queue.
-   */
-
   connection_or_write_cell_to_buf(&cell, conn);
   return 0;
 }

+ 23 - 0
src/or/relay.c

@@ -1194,6 +1194,7 @@ connection_edge_process_relay_cell(cell_t *cell, circuit_t *circ,
       }
       if (circ->n_conn) {
         uint8_t trunc_reason = *(uint8_t*)(cell->payload + RELAY_HEADER_SIZE);
+        circuit_clear_cell_queue(circ, circ->n_conn);
         connection_or_send_destroy(circ->n_circ_id, circ->n_conn,
                                    trunc_reason);
         circuit_set_n_circid_orconn(circ, 0, NULL);
@@ -2377,6 +2378,9 @@ append_cell_to_circuit_queue(circuit_t *circ, or_connection_t *orconn,
 {
   cell_queue_t *queue;
   int streams_blocked;
+  if (circ->marked_for_close)
+    return;
+
   if (direction == CELL_DIRECTION_OUT) {
     queue = &circ->n_conn_cells;
     streams_blocked = circ->streams_blocked_on_n_conn;
@@ -2479,6 +2483,25 @@ decode_address_from_payload(tor_addr_t *addr_out, const char *payload,
   return payload + 2 + (uint8_t)payload[1];
 }
 
+/** Remove all the cells queued on <b>circ</b> for <b>orconn</b>. */
+void
+circuit_clear_cell_queue(circuit_t *circ, or_connection_t *orconn)
+{
+  cell_queue_t *queue;
+  if (circ->n_conn == orconn) {
+    queue = &circ->n_conn_cells;
+  } else {
+    or_circuit_t *orcirc = TO_OR_CIRCUIT(circ);
+    tor_assert(orcirc->p_conn == orconn);
+    queue = &orcirc->p_conn_cells;
+  }
+
+  if (queue->n)
+    make_circuit_inactive_on_conn(circ,orconn);
+
+  cell_queue_clear(queue);
+}
+
 /** Fail with an assert if the active circuits ring on <b>orconn</b> is
  * corrupt.  */
 void

+ 1 - 0
src/or/relay.h

@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ const char *decode_address_from_payload(tor_addr_t *addr_out,
 unsigned cell_ewma_get_tick(void);
 void cell_ewma_set_scale_factor(or_options_t *options,
                                 networkstatus_t *consensus);
+void circuit_clear_cell_queue(circuit_t *circ, or_connection_t *orconn);
 
 #endif