|
|
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
|
|
|
One could argue, though, that once those servers are over-congested,
|
|
|
their bandwidth per circuit drops, which would in turn lower their
|
|
|
reputation in the future. A question is whether this would overall
|
|
|
- stablize.
|
|
|
+ stabilize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another possible way is to keep a cap on reputation. In this way, a
|
|
|
fraction of servers would have the same high reputation, thus balancing
|
|
|
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@
|
|
|
gets preferred treatment at each node. A node "spends" its value, which
|
|
|
it earned a priori by providing service, to the next node by sending
|
|
|
and receiving bytes. Once a node has overspent its values, the circuit
|
|
|
- cannot stay as premium. It can either breaks or converts into a normal
|
|
|
+ cannot stay as premium. It either breaks or converts into a normal
|
|
|
circuit. Each node also reserves a small portion of bandwidth for
|
|
|
normal circuits to prevent starvation.
|
|
|
|
Roger Dingledine