|
|
@@ -270,6 +270,25 @@ snipe them?
|
|
|
Takedowns and efnet abuse and wikipedia complaints and irc
|
|
|
networks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+This is potentially a bigger problem than it may appear.
|
|
|
+On the one hand, if people want to refuse connections from you on
|
|
|
+their servers it would seem that they should be allowed to. But, a
|
|
|
+possible major problem with the blocking of Tor is that it's not just
|
|
|
+the decision of the individual server administrator whose deciding if
|
|
|
+he wants to post to wikipedia from his Tor node address or allow
|
|
|
+people to read wikipedia anonymously through his Tor node. If e.g.,
|
|
|
+s/he comes through a campus or corporate NAT, then the decision must
|
|
|
+be to have the entire population behind it able to have a Tor exit
|
|
|
+node or write access to wikipedia. This is a loss for both of us (Tor
|
|
|
+and wikipedia). We don't want to compete for (or divvy up) the NAT
|
|
|
+protected entities of the world.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Squishy IP based ``authentication'' and ``authorization'' is a reality
|
|
|
+we must contend with. We should say something more about the analogy
|
|
|
+with SSNs.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
\subsection{Other}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tor's scope: How much should Tor aim to do? Applications that leak
|
Paul Syverson