123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566 |
- Part one: Overview and explanation
- Because tor is an application-level proxy, it needs client-side support
- from every client program that wants to use it. (This is different from
- systems like Freedom, which used a single client-side program to capture
- all packets and redirect them to the Freedom network.) Client applications
- need two general classes of modifications to be compatible with tor:
- 1) Whenever they call connect(), they instead should connect() to the
- local onion proxy and tell it "address and port". The onion proxy will
- itself make a connection to "address and port", and then the client
- application can talk through that socket as if it's directly connected. To
- support as many applications as possible, tor uses the common "socks"
- protocol which does exactly the above. So applications with socks support
- will support tor without needing any modifications.
- 2) Applications must not call gethostbyname() to resolve an address
- they intend to later connect() to via onion routing. gethostbyname()
- contacts the dns server of the target machine -- thus giving away the
- fact that you intend to make an anonymous connection to it.
- To clarify, I need to explain more about the socks protocol. Socks
- comes in three flavors: 4, 4a, and 5. The socks4 protocol basically
- uses IP and port -- so it is unsuitable because of the gethostbyname()
- issue above. Socks4a is a slight modification to the socks4 protocol,
- whereby you can specify an IP of 0.0.0.x to signal the socks server
- that you will instead be sending a hostname (fqdn). So applications with
- socks4a support are all set. Socks5, on the other hand, allows the client
- to specify "address type" and then an address -- so some applications
- choose to supply an IP and others choose to supply a hostname. If the
- application uses socks5 you must investigate further to decide whether
- it's leaking anonymity.
- Part two: using tsocks to transparently replace library calls
- tsocks (available from http://tsocks.sourceforge.net/ or from your
- favorite apt-get equivalent) allows you to run a program as normal,
- but it replaces the system calls for connect() to connect to the socks
- server first and then pass it your destination info. In our case the
- socks server is a tor process (running either locally or elsewhere).
- In general this works quite well for command-line processes like finger,
- ssh, etc. But there are a couple of catches: A) tsocks doesn't intercept
- calls to gethostbyname. So unless you specify an IP rather than hostname,
- you'll be giving yourself away. B) Programs which are suid don't let you
- intercept the system calls -- ssh falls into this category. But you can
- make a local copy of ssh and use that. C) Probably tsocks doesn't behave
- well for behemoths like Mozilla.
- Part three: applications which support tor correctly
- [this section is outdated and wrong. we should tie it into the main
- tor-doc.html one day.]
- http: Mozilla: set your socks4 proxy to be the onion proxy (but see above)
- privoxy: set your socks4a proxy to be the onion proxy
- wget: run privoxy, and then add the line
- "http_proxy=http://localhost:8118" to your ~/.wgetrc.
- ssh: tsocks ssh arma@18.244.0.188
- ftp: tsocks wget ftp://18.244.0.188/quux.tar --passive
- Mozilla: set your socks4 proxy to be the onion proxy
|