#6 test how a static 0 buf performs vs. implicit CoW

開啟中
j3tracey1 年之前創建 · 0 條評論

All message bodies as sent on the wire are some number of 0 bytes. Currently, we're relying on the hope that the malloc implementation we boil down to is smart enough to have a good-sized 0-buf that can be allocated via CoW, so that no actual allocations need to occur for the message bodies. It might be a good idea to double check this (or similar) is what's happening by creating a static buffer of [0u8; MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE] that would presumably end up in the executable .bss, and making message bodies slices into that static buffer, then comparing their performance and memory overhead.

All message bodies as sent on the wire are some number of 0 bytes. Currently, we're relying on the hope that the malloc implementation we boil down to is smart enough to have a good-sized 0-buf that can be allocated via CoW, so that no actual allocations need to occur for the message bodies. It might be a good idea to double check this (or similar) is what's happening by creating a static buffer of `[0u8; MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE]` that would presumably end up in the executable `.bss`, and making message bodies slices into that static buffer, then comparing their performance and memory overhead.
登入 才能加入這對話。
未選擇里程碑
未指派成員
1 參與者
正在加載...
取消
保存
尚未有任何內容