|
@@ -49,13 +49,39 @@ N - Destroy and truncated cells should have reasons.
|
|
|
- Implement
|
|
|
|
|
|
N - Only use a routerdesc if you recognize its hash.
|
|
|
- - (Must defer till dirservers are upgraded to latest code, which
|
|
|
+ o (Must defer till dirservers are upgraded to latest code, which
|
|
|
actually generates these hashes.)
|
|
|
- Of course, authdirservers must not do this.
|
|
|
- - Should directory mirrors do something else entirely?
|
|
|
o If we have a routerdesc for Bob, and he says, "I'm 0.1.0.x", don't
|
|
|
fetch a new one if it was published in the last 2 hours.
|
|
|
- How does this interact with the 'recognized hash' rule?
|
|
|
+ - Do not ask for any routers until we have 2 networkstatuses.
|
|
|
+ - Client side:
|
|
|
+ - Keep a record of which hash is most desirable for each router inside
|
|
|
+ local_routerstatus_t.
|
|
|
+ - If any hash is listed by two or more networkstatuses, the most
|
|
|
+ recent such hash is most desirable.
|
|
|
+ - Otherwise, the most recent is desirable.
|
|
|
+ - Once we've accepted a router, it's okay.
|
|
|
+ - Do not accept a router that no networkstatus lists. (This should maybe
|
|
|
+ get stricter.)
|
|
|
+ - Download by fingerprint.
|
|
|
+ - Reset failure count to zero when hash changes.
|
|
|
+ - Mirrors and authorities:
|
|
|
+ - Every time we hear a new networkstatus, we want every hash it lists.
|
|
|
+ - Make sure that we are always willing to keep at least N routerinfos
|
|
|
+ per router, where N = number of authorities.
|
|
|
+ - Do whatever else is needed to be sure that we don't request
|
|
|
+ hashes that would be immediately discarded, or discard hashes
|
|
|
+ that would be immediately re-requested.
|
|
|
+ - Only fetch routerinfo from an authority that mentions is.
|
|
|
+ - Only ask each authority once.
|
|
|
+ - Retry soon after failure.
|
|
|
+ - We need one bit per routerstatus for "should we download from
|
|
|
+ this guy."
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+N - Should router info have a pointer to routerstatus?
|
|
|
+ - We should at least do something about the duplicated fields.
|
|
|
|
|
|
R - Christian Grothoff's attack of infinite-length circuit.
|
|
|
the solution is to have a separate 'extend-data' cell type
|