fix up a confusion on the release notes (thanks karsten)

svn:r15793

ChangeLog

@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ Changes in version 0.2.0.9-alpha - 2007-10-24
       "Unnamed". Now we can list servers that happen to pick the same
       nickname as a server that registered two years ago and then
       disappeared. Partially implements proposal 122.
-    - If the consensus list a router as "Unnamed", the name is assigned
+    - If the consensus lists a router as "Unnamed", the name is assigned
       to a different router: do not identify the router by that name.
       Partially implements proposal 122.
     - Authorities can now come to a consensus on which method to use to

ReleaseNotes

@@ -226,9 +226,9 @@ Changes in version 0.2.0.30 - 2008-07-xx
       at least 100KB/s, and consider their bandwidth adequate to be a
       Guard if it is at least 250KB/s, no matter the medians. This fix
       complements proposal 107.
-    - Directory authorities now never mark more than 3 servers per IP as
-      Valid and Running. Implements proposal 109, by Kevin Bauer and
-      Damon McCoy.
+    - Directory authorities now never mark more than 2 servers per IP as
+      Valid and Running (or 5 on addresses shared by authorities).
+      Implements proposal 109, by Kevin Bauer and Damon McCoy.
     - If we're a relay, avoid picking ourselves as an introduction point,
       a rendezvous point, or as the final hop for internal circuits. Bug
       reported by taranis and lodger.