|
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ NOTE 2: It's easy to list stuff like this with no time estimates and
|
|
|
0.2.2, figure out how long the stuff we want will take, and
|
|
|
triage accordingly, or vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Design
|
|
|
+- Design only
|
|
|
- Begin design work for UDP transition; identify areas where we need to
|
|
|
make changes or instrument stuff early.
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -30,14 +30,31 @@ NOTE 2: It's easy to list stuff like this with no time estimates and
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Figure out good ways to instrument Tor internals so we can tell
|
|
|
how well our bandwidth and flow-control stuff is actually working.
|
|
|
+ - What ports eat the bandwidth?
|
|
|
+ - How full do queues get?
|
|
|
+ - How much latency do queues get?
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Features
|
|
|
+ - Rate limit at clients:
|
|
|
+ - Give clients an upper bound on how much they're willing to use
|
|
|
+ the network if they're not relaying?
|
|
|
+ - ... or group client circuits by IP at the server and rate-limit
|
|
|
+ like that.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Other features
|
|
|
- Proposals to implement:
|
|
|
- 146: reflect long-term stability
|
|
|
- 147: Stop using v2 directories to generate v3 votes.
|
|
|
+ - Start pinging as soon as we learn about a relay, not on a
|
|
|
+ 22-minute cycle. Prioritize new and volatile relays for
|
|
|
+ testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposals to improve and implement
|
|
|
- 158: microdescriptors
|
|
|
+ - 160: list bandwidth in consensus
|
|
|
+ - and actually set it reasonably
|
|
|
+ - and actually use it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposals to improve and implement if not broken
|
|
|
- IPv6 support. (Parts of 117, but figure out how to handle DNS
|
|
@@ -46,6 +63,23 @@ NOTE 2: It's easy to list stuff like this with no time estimates and
|
|
|
- 149: learn info from netinfo cells.
|
|
|
- 134: handle authority fragmentation (Needs more analysis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ - Needs a proposal, or at least some design
|
|
|
+ - Detect client-status better
|
|
|
+ - Have authorities report relay and voting status better: make it
|
|
|
+ easy to answer, "Why is my server not listed/not Guard/not
|
|
|
+ Running/etc"
|
|
|
+ - Have consensuses come in multiple "flavours".
|
|
|
+ - Weaken the requirements for being a Guard, based on K's
|
|
|
+ measurements.
|
|
|
+ - Adaptive timeouts for giving up on circuits and streams.
|
|
|
+ - Have weight for picking new nodes as guards be less stupid
|
|
|
+ - Lagged weight updates in consensuses: don't just move abruptly.
|
|
|
+ d Don't kill a circuit on the first failed extend.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Installers
|
|
|
+ - Switch to MSI on win32
|
|
|
+ - Use Thandy, perhaps?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
- Deprecations
|
|
|
- Make .exit safe, or make it off-by-default.
|
|
|
|