|
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ static char *connection_edge_end_reason(char *payload, uint16_t length) {
|
|
|
case END_STREAM_REASON_EXITPOLICY: return "exit policy failed";
|
|
|
case END_STREAM_REASON_DESTROY: return "destroyed";
|
|
|
case END_STREAM_REASON_DONE: return "closed normally";
|
|
|
+ case END_STREAM_REASON_TIMEOUT: return "gave up (timeout)";
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
assert(0);
|
|
|
return "";
|
|
@@ -531,6 +532,10 @@ void connection_ap_expire_beginning(void) {
|
|
|
if (now - conn->timestamp_lastread >= 15) {
|
|
|
log_fn(LOG_WARN,"Stream is %d seconds late. Retrying.",
|
|
|
(int)(now - conn->timestamp_lastread));
|
|
|
+ /* send an end down the circuit */
|
|
|
+ connection_edge_end(conn, END_STREAM_REASON_TIMEOUT, conn->cpath_layer);
|
|
|
+ /* un-mark it as ending, since we're going to reuse it */
|
|
|
+ conn->has_sent_end = 0;
|
|
|
/* move it back into 'pending' state. It's possible it will
|
|
|
* reattach to this same circuit, but that's good enough for now.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
@@ -540,11 +545,7 @@ void connection_ap_expire_beginning(void) {
|
|
|
conn->timestamp_lastread += 15;
|
|
|
if(connection_ap_handshake_attach_circuit(conn)<0) {
|
|
|
/* it will never work */
|
|
|
- /* Don't need to send end -- why? */
|
|
|
-/* XXX you're right, there's a bug. we should send an end cell
|
|
|
- * above, right before circuit_detach_stream. But if attach_circuit()
|
|
|
- * fails, then in fact we should mark without sending an end, because
|
|
|
- * we're not connected to anything. -RD */
|
|
|
+ /* Don't need to send end -- we're not connected */
|
|
|
connection_mark_for_close(conn, 0);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
@@ -567,7 +568,7 @@ void connection_ap_attach_pending(void)
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
if(connection_ap_handshake_attach_circuit(conn) < 0) {
|
|
|
/* -1 means it will never work */
|
|
|
- /* Don't send end; there is no 'other end' of the stream */
|
|
|
+ /* Don't send end; there is no 'other side' yet */
|
|
|
connection_mark_for_close(conn,0);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|