|
@@ -349,11 +349,13 @@ connection_dir_download_networkstatus_failed(dir_connection_t *conn,
|
|
static void
|
|
static void
|
|
connection_dir_download_routerdesc_failed(dir_connection_t *conn)
|
|
connection_dir_download_routerdesc_failed(dir_connection_t *conn)
|
|
{
|
|
{
|
|
- /* Try again. No need to increment the failure count for routerdescs, since
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ /* No need to increment the failure count for routerdescs, since
|
|
* it's not their fault. */
|
|
* it's not their fault. */
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ /* There's no need to call this here: we already call it every 10 seconds *
|
|
|
|
+ * (DESCRIPTOR_RETRY_INTERVAL) in main.c -NM */
|
|
/* update_router_descriptor_downloads(time(NULL)); */
|
|
/* update_router_descriptor_downloads(time(NULL)); */
|
|
(void) conn;
|
|
(void) conn;
|
|
- /* XXXX012 Why did the above get commented out? -NM */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Helper for directory_initiate_command_(router|trusted_dir): send the
|
|
/** Helper for directory_initiate_command_(router|trusted_dir): send the
|
|
@@ -2055,9 +2057,8 @@ dir_routerdesc_download_failed(smartlist_t *failed, int status_code)
|
|
cp, (int)rs->n_download_failures);
|
|
cp, (int)rs->n_download_failures);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /* XXX012 why did this get commented out too? -RD */
|
|
|
|
- /* Because we already call update_router_descriptor_downloads()
|
|
|
|
- * every 10 seconds (DESCRIPTOR_RETRY_INTERVAL) in main.c -NM */
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ /* There's no need to call this here: we already call it every 10 seconds *
|
|
|
|
+ * (DESCRIPTOR_RETRY_INTERVAL) in main.c -NM */
|
|
/* update_router_descriptor_downloads(time(NULL)); */
|
|
/* update_router_descriptor_downloads(time(NULL)); */
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|