i like the name FetchUselessDescriptors better.

svn:r6327

src/or/config.c

@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static config_var_t _option_vars[] = {
   VAR("FastFirstHopPK",      BOOL,     FastFirstHopPK,       "1"),
   VAR("FetchServerDescriptors",BOOL,   FetchServerDescriptors,"1"),
   VAR("FetchHidServDescriptors",BOOL,  FetchHidServDescriptors, "1"),
-  VAR("FetchUselessRouters", BOOL,     FetchUselessRouters,  "0"),
+  VAR("FetchUselessDescriptors",BOOL,  FetchUselessDescriptors, "0"),
   VAR("Group",               STRING,   Group,                NULL),
   VAR("HardwareAccel",       BOOL,     HardwareAccel,        "0"),
   VAR("HashedControlPassword",STRING,  HashedControlPassword, NULL),

src/or/or.h

@@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ typedef struct {
   int PublishHidServDescriptors; /**< and our hidden service descriptors? */
   int FetchServerDescriptors; /**< Do we fetch server descriptors as normal? */
   int FetchHidServDescriptors; /** and hidden service descriptors? */
-  int FetchUselessRouters; /**< Do we fetch non-running descriptors too? */
+  int FetchUselessDescriptors; /**< Do we fetch non-running descriptors too? */
   int AllDirActionsPrivate; /**< Should every directory action be sent
                              * through a Tor circuit? */
 

src/or/routerlist.c

@@ -3251,7 +3251,7 @@ client_would_use_router(routerstatus_t *rs, time_t now)
     /* This one is too old to consider. */
     return 0;
   }
-  if (!rs->is_running && !get_options()->FetchUselessRouters) {
+  if (!rs->is_running && !get_options()->FetchUselessDescriptors) {
     /* If we had this router descriptor, we wouldn't even bother using it.
      * But, if we want to have a complete list, fetch it anyway. */
     return 0;