瀏覽代碼

Don't cannibalize one-hop circuits

In rare cases, we could cannibalize a one-hop circuit, ending up
with a two-hop circuit. This circuit would not be actually used,
but we should prevent its creation in the first place.

Thanks to outofwords and swissknife for helping to analyse this.
Sebastian Hahn 15 年之前
父節點
當前提交
faf51fa52a
共有 2 個文件被更改,包括 12 次插入1 次删除
  1. 6 0
      changes/dont_cannibalize_onehop_circuits
  2. 6 1
      src/or/circuitlist.c

+ 6 - 0
changes/dont_cannibalize_onehop_circuits

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+ o Refactorings:
+   - Make it explicit that we don't cannibalize one-hop circuits. This happens
+     in the wild, but doesn't turn out to be a problem because we fortunately
+     don't use those circuits. Many thanks to outofwords for the initial
+     analysis and to swissknife who confirmed that two-hop circuits are
+     actually created.

+ 6 - 1
src/or/circuitlist.c

@@ -905,6 +905,10 @@ circuit_find_to_cannibalize(uint8_t purpose, extend_info_t *info,
   int need_capacity = (flags & CIRCLAUNCH_NEED_CAPACITY) != 0;
   int internal = (flags & CIRCLAUNCH_IS_INTERNAL) != 0;
 
+  /* Make sure we're not trying to create a onehop circ by
+   * cannibalization. */
+  tor_assert(!(flags & CIRCLAUNCH_ONEHOP_TUNNEL));
+
   log_debug(LD_CIRC,
             "Hunting for a circ to cannibalize: purpose %d, uptime %d, "
             "capacity %d, internal %d",
@@ -920,7 +924,8 @@ circuit_find_to_cannibalize(uint8_t purpose, extend_info_t *info,
       if ((!need_uptime || circ->build_state->need_uptime) &&
           (!need_capacity || circ->build_state->need_capacity) &&
           (internal == circ->build_state->is_internal) &&
-          circ->remaining_relay_early_cells) {
+          circ->remaining_relay_early_cells &&
+          !circ->build_state->onehop_tunnel) {
         if (info) {
           /* need to make sure we don't duplicate hops */
           crypt_path_t *hop = circ->cpath;