|
@@ -32,9 +32,10 @@ All versions should be distinguishable purely by those four
|
|
|
numbers. The status tag is purely informational, and lets you know how
|
|
|
stable we think the release is: "alpha" is pretty unstable; "rc" is a
|
|
|
release candidate; and no tag at all means that we have a final
|
|
|
-release. If the tag ends with "-cvs", you're looking at a development
|
|
|
-snapshot that came after a given release. If we *do* encounter two
|
|
|
-versions that differ only by status tag, we compare them lexically.
|
|
|
+release. If the tag ends with "-cvs" or "-dev", you're looking at a
|
|
|
+development snapshot that came after a given release. If we *do*
|
|
|
+encounter two versions that differ only by status tag, we compare them
|
|
|
+lexically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, we start each development branch with (say) 0.1.1.1-alpha. The
|
|
|
patchlevel increments consistently as the status tag changes, for
|