123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177 |
- Filename: 153-automatic-software-update-protocol.txt
- Title: Automatic software update protocol
- Version: $Revision$
- Last-Modified: $Date$
- Author: Jacob Appelbaum
- Created: 14-July-2008
- Status: Superseded
- [Superseded by thandy-spec.txt]
- Automatic Software Update Protocol Proposal
- 0.0 Introduction
- The Tor project and its users require a robust method to update shipped
- software bundles. The software bundles often includes Vidalia, Privoxy, Polipo,
- Torbutton and of course Tor itself. It is not inconcievable that an update
- could include all of the Tor Browser Bundle. It seems reasonable to make this
- a standalone program that can be called in shell scripts, cronjobs or by
- various Tor controllers.
- 0.1 Minimal Tasks To Implement Automatic Updating
- At the most minimal, an update must be able to do the following:
- 0 - Detect the curent Tor version, note the working status of Tor.
- 1 - Detect the latest Tor version.
- 2 - Fetch the latest version in the form of a platform specific package(s).
- 3 - Verify the itegrity of the downloaded package(s).
- 4 - Install the verified package(s).
- 5 - Test that the new package(s) works properly.
- 0.2 Specific Enumeration Of Minimal Tasks
- To implement requirement 0, we need to detect the current Tor version of both
- the updater and the current running Tor. The update program itself should be
- versioned internally. This requirement should also test connecting through Tor
- itself and note if such connections are possible.
- To implement requirement 1, we need to learn the concensus from the directory
- authorities or fail back to a known good URL with cryptographically signed
- content.
- To implement requirement 2, we need to download Tor - hopefully over Tor.
- To implement requirement 3, we need to verify the package signature.
- To implement requirement 4, we need to use a platform specific method of
- installation. The Tor controller performing the update perform these platform
- specific methods.
- To implement requirement 5, we need to be able to extend circuits and reach
- the internet through Tor.
- 0.x Implementation Goals
- The update system will be cross platform and rely on as little external code
- as possible. If the update system uses it, it must be updated by the update
- system itself. It will consist only of free software and will not rely on any
- non-free components until the actual installation phase. If a package manager
- is in use, it will be platform specific and thus only invoked by the update
- system implementing the update protocol.
- The update system itself will attempt to perform update related network
- activity over Tor. Possibly it will attempt to use a hidden service first.
- It will attempt to use novel and not so novel caching
- when possible, it will always verify cryptographic signatures before any
- remotely fetched code is executed. In the event of an unusable Tor system,
- it will be able to attempt to fetch updates without Tor. This should be user
- configurable, some users will be unwilling to update without the protection of
- using Tor - others will simply be unable because of blocking of the main Tor
- website.
- The update system will track current version numbers of Tor and supporting
- software. The update system will also track known working versions to assist
- with automatic The update system itself will be a standalone library. It will be
- strongly versioned internally to match the Tor bundle it was shiped with. The
- update system will keep track of the given platform, cpu architecture, lsb_release,
- package management functionality and any other platform specific metadata.
- We have referenced two popular automatic update systems, though neither fit
- our needs, both are useful as an idea of what others are doing in the same
- area.
- The first is sparkle[0] but it is sadly only available for Cocoa
- environments and is written in Objective C. This doesn't meet our requirements
- because it is directly tied into the private Apple framework.
- The second is the Mozilla Automatic Update System[1]. It is possibly useful
- as an idea of how other free software projects automatically update. It is
- however not useful in its currently documented form.
- [0] http://sparkle.andymatuschak.org/documentation/
- [1] http://wiki.mozilla.org/AUS:Manual
- 0.x Previous methods of Tor and related software update
- Previously, Tor users updated their Tor related software by hand. There has
- been no fully automatic method for any user to update. In addition, there
- hasn't been any specific way to find out the most current stable version of Tor
- or related software as voted on by the directory authority concensus.
- 0.x Changes to the directory specification
- We will want to supplement client-versions and server-versions in the
- concensus voting with another version identifier known as
- 'auto-update-versions'. This will keep track of the current concensus of
- specific versions that are best per platform and per architecture. It should
- be noted that while the Mac OS X universal binary may be the best for x86
- processers with Tiger, it may not be the best for PPC users on Panther. This
- goes for all of the package updates. We want to prevent updates that cause Tor
- to break even if the updating program can recover gracefully.
- x.x Assumptions About Operating System Package Management
- It is assumed that users will use their package manager unless they are on
- Microsoft Windows (any version) or Mac OS X (any version). Microsoft Windows
- users will have integration with the normal "add/remove program" functionality
- that said users would expect.
- x.x Package Update System Failure Modes
- The package update will try to ensure that a user always has a working Tor at
- the very least. It will keep state to remember versions of Tor that were able
- to bootstrap properly and reach the rest of the Tor network. It will also keep
- note of which versions broke. It will select the best Tor that works for the
- user. It will also allow for anonymized bug reporting on the packages
- available and tested by the auto-update system.
- x.x Package Signature Verification
- The update system will be aware of replay attacks against the update signature
- system itself. It will not allow package update signatures that are radically
- out of date. It will be a multi-key system to prevent any single party from
- forging an update. The key will be updated regularly. This is like authority
- key (see proposal 103) usage.
- x.x Package Caching
- The update system will iterate over different update methods. Whichever method
- is picked will have caching functionality. Each Tor server itself should be
- able to serve cached update files. This will be an option that friendly server
- administrators can turn on should they wish to support caching. In addition,
- it is possible to cache the full contents of a package in an
- authoratative DNS zone. Users can then query the DNS zone for their package.
- If we wish to further distribute the update load, we can also offer packages
- with encrypted bittorrent. Clients who wish to share the updates but do not
- wish to be a server can help distribute Tor updates. This can be tied together
- with the DNS caching[2][3] if needed.
- [2] http://www.netrogenic.com/dnstorrent/
- [3] http://www.doxpara.com/ozymandns_src_0.1.tgz
- x.x Helping Our Users Spread Tor
- There should be a way for a user to participate in the packaging caching as
- described in section x.x. This option should be presented by the Tor
- controller.
- x.x Simple HTTP Proxy To The Tor Project Website
- It has been suggested that we should provide a simple proxy that allows a user
- to visit the main Tor website to download packages. This was part of a
- previous proposal and has not been closely examined.
- x.x Package Installation
- Platform specific methods for proper package installation will be left to the
- controller that is calling for an update. Each platform is different, the
- installation options and user interface will be specific to the controller in
- question.
- x.x Other Things
- Other things should be added to this proposal. What are they?
|