123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438439440441442443444445446447448449450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464465466467468469470471472473474475476477478479480481482483484485486487488489490491492493494495496497498499500501502503504505506507508509510511512513514515516517518519520521522 |
- $Id$
- Tor directory protocol for 0.1.1.x series
- 0. Scope and preliminaries
- This document should eventually be merged to replace and supplement the
- existing notes on directories in tor-spec.txt.
- This is not a finalized version; what we actually wind up implementing
- may be different from the system described here.
- 0.1. Goals
- There are several problems with the way Tor handles directory information
- in version 0.1.0.x and earlier. Here are the problems we try to fix with
- this new design, already partially implemented in 0.1.1.x:
- 1. Directories are very large and use up a lot of bandwidth: clients
- download descriptors for all router several times an hour.
- 2. Every directory authority is a trust bottleneck: if a single
- directory authority lies, it can make clients believe for a time an
- arbitrarily distorted view of the Tor network.
- 3. Our current "verified server" system is kind of nonsensical.
- 4. Getting more directory authorities adds more points of failure and
- worsens possible partitioning attacks.
- There are two problems that remain unaddressed by this design.
- 5. Requiring every client to know about every router won't scale.
- 6. Requiring every directory cache to know every router won't scale.
- 1. Outline
- There is a small set (say, around 10) of semi-trusted directory
- authorities. A default list of authorities is shipped with the Tor
- software. Users can change this list, but are encouraged not to do so, in
- order to avoid partitioning attacks.
- Routers periodically upload signed "descriptors" to the directory
- authorities describing their keys, capabilities, and other information.
- Routers may act as directory mirrors (also called "caches"), to reduce
- load on the directory authorities. They announce this in their
- descriptors.
- Each directory authority periodically generates and signs a compact
- "network status" document that lists that authority's view of the current
- descriptors and status for known routers, but which does not include the
- descriptors themselves.
- Directory mirrors download, cache, and re-serve network-status documents
- to clients.
- Clients, directory mirrors, and directory authorities all use
- network-status documents to find out when their list of routers is
- out-of-date. If it is, they download any missing router descriptors.
- Clients download missing descriptors from mirrors; mirrors and authorities
- download from authorities. Descriptors are downloaded by the hash of the
- descriptor, not by the server's identity key: this prevents servers from
- attacking clients by giving them descriptors nobody else uses.
- All directory information is uploaded and downloaded with HTTP.
- Coordination among directory authorities is done client-side: clients
- compute a vote-like algorithm among the network-status documents they
- have, and base their decisions on the result.
- 1.1. What's different from 0.1.0.x?
- Clients used to download a signed concatenated set of router descriptors
- (called a "directory") from directory mirrors, regardless of which
- descriptors had changed.
- Between downloading directories, clients would download "network-status"
- documents that would list which servers were supposed to running.
- Clients would always believe the most recently published network-status
- document they were served.
- Routers used to upload fresh descriptors all the time, whether their keys
- and other information had changed or not.
- 2. Router operation
- The router descriptor format is unchanged from tor-spec.txt.
- ORs SHOULD generate a new router descriptor whenever any of the
- following events have occurred:
- - A period of time (18 hrs by default) has passed since the last
- time a descriptor was generated.
- - A descriptor field other than bandwidth or uptime has changed.
- - Bandwidth has changed by more than +/- 50% from the last time a
- descriptor was generated, and at least a given interval of time
- (20 mins by default) has passed since then.
- - Its uptime has been reset (by restarting).
- After generating a descriptor, ORs upload it to every directory
- authority they know, by posting it to the URL
- http://<hostname>/tor/
- 3. Network status format
- Directory authorities generate, sign, and compress network-status
- documents. Directory servers SHOULD generate a fresh network-status
- document when the contents of such a document would be different from the
- last one generated, and some time (at least one second, possibly longer)
- has passed since the last one was generated.
- The network status document contains a preamble, a set of router status
- entries, and a signature, in that order.
- We use the same meta-format as used for directories and router descriptors
- in "tor-spec.txt". Implementations MAY insert blank lines
- for clarity between sections; these blank lines are ignored.
- Implementations MUST NOT depend on blank lines in any particular location.
- As used here, "whitespace" is a sequence of 1 or more tab or space
- characters.
- The preamble contains:
- "network-status-version" -- A document format version. For this
- specification, the version is "2".
- "dir-source" -- The authority's hostname, current IP address, and
- directory port, all separated by whitespace.
- "fingerprint" -- A base16-encoded hash of the signing key's
- fingerprint, with no additional spaces added.
- "contact" -- An arbitrary string describing how to contact the
- directory server's administrator. Administrators should include at
- least an email address and a PGP fingerprint.
- "dir-signing-key" -- The directory server's public signing key.
- "client-versions" -- A comma-separated list of recommended client
- versions.
- "server-versions" -- A comma-separated list of recommended server
- versions.
- "published" -- The publication time for this network-status object.
- "dir-options" -- A set of flags, in any order, separated by whitespace:
- "Names" if this directory authority performs name bindings.
- "Versions" if this directory authority recommends software versions.
- The dir-options entry is optional. The "-versions" entries are required if
- the "Versions" flag is present. The other entries are required and must
- appear exactly once. The "network-status-version" entry must appear first;
- the others may appear in any order. Implementations MUST ignore
- additional arguments to the items above, and MUST ignore unrecognized
- flags.
- For each router, the router entry contains: (This format is designed for
- conciseness.)
- "r" -- followed by the following elements, in order, separated by
- whitespace:
- - The OR's nickname,
- - A hash of its identity key, encoded in base64, with trailing =
- signs removed.
- - A hash of its most recent descriptor, encoded in base64, with
- trailing = signs removed. (The hash is calculated as for
- computing the signature of a descriptor.)
- - The publication time of its most recent descriptor, in the form
- YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS, in GMT.
- - An IP address
- - An OR port
- - A directory port (or "0" for none")
- "s" -- A series of whitespace-separated status flags, in any order:
- "Authority" if the router is a directory authority.
- "Exit" if the router is useful for building general-purpose exit
- circuits.
- "Fast" if the router is suitable for high-bandwidth circuits.
- "Guard" if the router is suitable for use as an entry guard.
- (Currently, this means 'fast' and 'stable'.)
- "Named" if the router's identity-nickname mapping is canonical,
- and this authority binds names.
- "Stable" if the router is suitable for long-lived circuits.
- "Running" if the router is currently usable.
- "Valid" if the router has been 'validated'.
- "V2Dir" if the router implements this protocol.
- The "r" entry for each router must appear first and is required. The
- 's" entry is optional. Unrecognized flags and extra elements on the
- "r" line must be ignored.
- The signature section contains:
- "directory-signature". A signature of the rest of the document using
- the directory authority's signing key.
- We compress the network status list with zlib before transmitting it.
- 3.1. Establishing server status
- [[XXXXX Describe how authorities actually decide Fast, Named, Stable,
- Running, Valid
- For each OR, a directory server remembers whether the OR was running and
- functional the last time they tried to connect to it, and possibly other
- liveness information.
- Directory server administrators may label some servers or IPs as
- blacklisted, and elect not to include them in their network-status lists.
- Thus, the network-status list includes all non-blacklisted,
- non-expired, non-superseded descriptors for ORs that the directory has
- observed at least once to be running.
- Directory server administrators may decide to support name binding. If
- they do, then they must maintain a file of nickname-to-identity-key
- mappings, and try to keep this file consistent with other directory
- servers. If they don't, they act as clients, and report bindings made by
- other directory servers (name X is bound to identity Y if at least one
- binding directory lists it, and no directory binds X to some other Y'.)
- ]]
- 4. Directory server operation
- All directory authorities and directory mirrors ("directory servers")
- implement this section, except as noted.
- 4.1. Accepting uploads (authorities only)
- When a router posts a signed descriptor to a directory authority, the
- authority first checks whether it is well-formed and correctly
- self-signed. If it is, the authority next verifies that the nickname
- question is already assigned to a router with a different public key.
- Finally, the authority MAY check that the router is not blacklisted
- because of its key, IP, or another reason.
- If the descriptor passes these tests, and the authority does not already
- have a descriptor for a router with this public key, it accepts the
- descriptor and remembers it.
- If the authority _does_ have a descriptor with the same public key, the
- newly uploaded descriptor is remembered if its publication time is more
- recent than the most recent old descriptor for that router, and either:
- - There are non-cosmetic differences between the old descriptor and the
- new one.
- - Enough time has passed between the descriptors' publication times.
- (Currently, 12 hours.)
- Differences between router descriptors are "non-cosmetic" if they would be
- sufficient to force an upload as described in section 2 above.
- Note that the "cosmetic difference" test only applies to uploaded
- descriptors, not to descriptors that the authority downloads from other
- authorities.
- 4.2. Downloading network-status documents
- All directory servers (authorities and mirrors) try to keep a fresh
- set of network-status documents from every authority. To do so,
- every 5 minutes, each authority asks every other authority for its
- most recent network-status document. Every 15 minutes, each mirror
- picks a random authority and asks it for the most recent network-status
- documents for all the authorities the authority knows about (including
- the chosen authority itself).
- Directory servers and mirrors remember and serve the most recent
- network-status document they have from each authority. Other
- network-status documents don't need to be stored. If the most recent
- network-status document is over 10 days old, it is discarded anyway.
- Mirrors SHOULD store and serve network-status documents from authorities
- they don't recognize, but SHOULD NOT use such documents for any other
- purpose.
- 4.3. Downloading and storing router descriptors
- Periodically (currently, every 10 seconds), directory servers check
- whether there are any specific descriptors (as identified by descriptor
- hash in a network-status document) that they do not have and that they
- are not currently trying to download.
- If so, the directory server launches requests to the authorities for these
- descriptors, such that each authority is only asked for descriptors listed
- in its most recent network-status. When more than one authority lists the
- descriptor, we choose which to ask at random.
- If one of these downloads fails, we do not try to download that descriptor
- from the authority that failed to serve it again unless we receive a newer
- network-status from that authority that lists the same descriptor.
- Directory servers must potentially cache multiple descriptors for each
- router. Servers must not discard any descriptor listed by any current
- network-status document from any authority. If there is enough space to
- store additional descriptors [XXXXXX then how do we pick.]
- Authorities SHOULD NOT download descriptors for routers that they would
- immediately reject for reasons listed in 3.1.
- 4.4. HTTP URLs
- "Fingerprints" in these URLs are base-16-encoded SHA1 hashes.
- The authoritative network-status published by a host should be available at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/status/authority.z
- The network-status published by a host with fingerprint
- <F> should be available at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/status/fp/<F>.z
- The network-status documents published by hosts with fingerprints
- <F1>,<F2>,<F3> should be available at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/status/fp/<F1>+<F2>+<F3>.z
- The most recent network-status documents from all known authorities,
- concatenated, should be available at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/status/all.z
- The most recent descriptor for a server whose identity key has a
- fingerprint of <F> should be available at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/server/fp/<F>.z
- The most recent descriptors for servers with identity fingerprints
- <F1>,<F2>,<F3> should be available at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/server/fp/<F1>+<F2>+<F3>.z
- (NOTE: Implementations SHOULD NOT download descriptors by identity key
- fingerprint. This allows a corrupted server (in collusion with a cache) to
- provide a unique descriptor to a client, and thereby partition that client
- from the rest of the network.)
- The server descriptor with (descriptor) digest <D> (in hex) should be
- available at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/server/d/<D>.z
- The most recent descriptors with digests <D1>,<D2>,<D3> should be
- available at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/server/d/<D1>+<D2>+<D3>.z
- The most recent descriptor for this server should be at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/server/authority.z
- [Nothing in the Tor protocol uses this resource yet, but it is useful
- for debugging purposes. Also, the official Tor implementations
- (starting at 0.1.1.x) use this resource to test whether a server's
- own DirPort is reachable.]
- A concatenated set of the most recent descriptors for all known servers
- should be available at:
- http://<hostname>/tor/server/all.z
- For debugging, directories SHOULD expose non-compressed objects at URLs like
- the above, but without the final ".z".
- Clients MUST handle compressed concatenated information in two forms:
- - A concatenated list of zlib-compressed objects.
- - A zlib-compressed concatenated list of objects.
- Directory servers MAY generate either format: the former requires less
- CPU, but the latter requires less bandwidth.
- Clients SHOULD use upper case letters (A-F) when base16-encoding
- fingerprints. Servers MUST accept both upper and lower case fingerprints
- in requests.
- 5. Client operation: downloading information
- Every Tor that is not a directory server (that is, clients and ORs that do
- not have a DirPort set) implements this section.
- 5.1. Downloading network-status documents
- Each client maintains an ordered list of directory authorities.
- Insofar as possible, clients SHOULD all use the same ordered list.
- Clients check whether they have enough recently published network-status
- documents (currently, this means that they must have a network-status
- published within the last 48 hours for over half of the authorities).
- If they do not, they download enough network-status documents so that this
- is so.
- Also, if the most recently published network-status document is over 30
- minutes old, the client downloads a network-status document.
- When choosing which documents to download, clients treat their list of
- directory authorities as a circular ring, and begin with the authority
- appearing immediately after the authority for their most recently
- published network-status document.
- If enough mirrors (currently 4) claim not to have a given network status,
- we stop trying to download that authority's network-status, until we
- download a new network-status that makes us believe that the authority in
- question is running.
- Network-status documents published over 10 hours in the past are
- discarded.
- 5.2. Downloading router descriptors
- Clients try to have the best descriptor for each router. A descriptor is
- "best" if:
- * it the most recently published descriptor listed for that router by
- at least two network-status documents.
- * OR, no descriptor for that router is listed by two or more
- network-status documents, and it is the most recently published
- descriptor listed by any network-status document.
- Periodically (currently every 10 seconds) clients check whether there are
- any "downloadable" descriptors. A descriptor is downloadable if:
- - It is the "best" descriptor for some router.
- - The descriptor was published at least 5 minutes (???) in the past.
- [This prevents clients from trying to fetch descriptors that the
- mirrors have not yet retrieved and cached.]
- - The client does not currently have it.
- - The client is not currently trying to download it.
- If at least 1/16 of known routers have downloadable descriptors, or if
- enough time (currently 10 minutes) has passed since the last time the
- client tried to download descriptors, it launches requests for all
- downloadable descriptors, as described in 5.3 below.
- When a descriptor download fails, the client notes it, and does not
- consider the descriptor downloadable again until a certain amount of time
- has passed. (Currently 0 seconds for the first failure, 60 seconds for the
- second, 5 minutes for the third, 10 minutes for the fourth, and 1 day
- thereafter.) Periodically (currently once an hour) clients reset the
- failure count.
- No descriptors are downloaded until the client has downloaded more than
- half of the network-status documents.
- 5.3. Managing downloads
- When a client has no live network-status documents, it downloads
- network-status documents from a randomly chosen authority. In all other
- cases, the client downloads from mirrors randomly chosen from among those
- believed to be V2 directory servers. (This information comes from the
- network-status documents; see 6 below.)
- When downloading multiple router descriptors, the client chooses multiple
- mirrors so that:
- - At least 3 different mirrors are used, except when this would result
- in more than one request for under 4 descriptors.
- - No more than 128 descriptors are requested from a single mirror.
- - Otherwise, as few mirrors as possible are used.
- After choosing mirrors, the client divides the descriptors among them
- randomly.
- After receiving any response client MUST discard any network-status
- documents and descriptors that it did not request.
- 6. Using directory information
- Everyone besides directory authorities uses the approaches in this section
- to decide which servers to use and what their keys are likely to be.
- (Directory authorities just believe their own opinions, as in 3.1 above.)
- 6.1. Choosing routers for circuits.
- Tor implementations only pay attention to "live" network-status documents.
- A network status is "live" if it is the most recently downloaded network
- status document for a given directory server, and the server is a
- directory server trusted by the client, and the network-status document is
- no more than 2 days old.
- For time-sensitive information, Tor implementations focus on "recent"
- network-status documents. A network status is "recent" if it is live, and
- if it was published in the last 60 minutes. If there are fewer
- than 3 such documents, the most recently published 3 are "recent." If
- there are fewer than 3 in all, all are "recent.")
- Circuits SHOULD NOT be built until the client has enough directory
- information: at least two live network-status documents, and descriptors
- for at least 1/4 of the servers believed to be running.
- A server is "listed" if it is included by more than half of the live
- network status documents. Clients SHOULD NOT use unlisted servers.
- A server is "valid" if it is listed as valid by more than half of the live
- network-status documents. Clients SHOULD NOT use non-valid servers unless
- specifically configured to do so.
- A server is "running" if it is listed as running by more than half of the
- recent network-status documents. Clients SHOULD NOT try to use
- non-running servers.
- A server is believed to be a directory mirror if it is listed as a V2
- directory by more than half of the recent network-status documents.
- 6.1. Managing naming
- In order to provide human-memorable names for individual server
- identities, some directory servers bind names to IDs. Clients handle
- names in two ways:
- When a client encounters a name it has not mapped before:
- If all the live "Naming" network-status documents the client has
- claim that the name binds to some identity ID, and the client has at
- least three live network-status documents, the client maps the name to
- ID.
- If a client encounters a name it has mapped before:
- It uses the last-mapped identity value, unless all of the "Naming"
- network status documents that list the name bind it to some other
- identity.
- When a user tries to refer to a router with a name that does not have a
- mapping under the above rules, the implementation SHOULD warn the user.
- After giving the warning, the implementation MAY use a router that at
- least one Naming authority maps the name to, so long as no other naming
- authority maps that name to a different router.
- 6.2. Software versions
- An implementation of Tor SHOULD warn when it has live network-statuses from
- more than half of the authorities, and it is running a software version
- not listed on more than half of the live "Versioning" network-status
- documents.
- TODO:
- - Resolve XXXXs
- - Are the magic numbers above sane?
- - Client-knowledge partitioning is worrisome. Most versions of this
- don't seem to be worse than the Danezis-Murdoch tracing attack, since
- an attacker can't do more than deduce probable exits from entries (or
- vice versa). But what about when the client connects to A and B but in
- a different order? How bad can it be partitioned based on its
- knowledge?
|