| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657 | 
							
-                           Tor's (little) Firewall Helper specification
 
-                                       Jacob Appelbaum
 
- 0. Preface
 
-  This document describes issues faced by Tor users who are behind NAT devices
 
-  and wish to share their resources with the rest of the Tor network. It also
 
-  explains a possible solution for some NAT devices.
 
- 1. Overview
 
-  Tor users often wish to relay traffic for the Tor network and their upstream
 
-  firewall thwarts their attempted generosity.  Automatic port forwarding
 
-  configuration for many consumer NAT devices is often available with two common
 
-  protocols NAT-PMP[0] and UPnP[1].
 
- 2. Implementation
 
-  tor-fw-helper is a program that implements basic port forwarding requests; it
 
-  may be used alone or called from Tor itself.
 
- 2.1 Output format
 
-  When tor-fw-helper has completed the requested action successfully, it will
 
-  report the following message to standard output:
 
-     tor-fw-helper: SUCCESS
 
-  If tor-fw-helper was unable to complete the requested action successfully, it
 
-  will report the following message to standard error:
 
-     tor-fw-helper: FAILURE
 
-  All informational messages are printed to standard output; all error messages
 
-  are printed to standard error. Messages other than SUCCESS and FAILURE
 
-  may be printed by any compliant tor-fw-helper.
 
- 2.2 Output format stability
 
-  The above SUCCESS and FAILURE messages are the only stable output formats
 
-  provided by this specification. tor-fw-helper-spec compliant implementations
 
-  must return SUCCESS or FAILURE as defined above.
 
- 3. Security Concerns
 
-  It is probably best to hand configure port forwarding and in the process, we
 
-  suggest disabling NAT-PMP and/or UPnP. This is of course absolutely confusing
 
-  to users and so we support automatic, non-authenticated NAT port mapping
 
-  protocols with compliant tor-fw-helper applications.
 
-  NAT should not be considered a security boundary. NAT-PMP and UPnP are hacks
 
-  to deal with the shortcomings of user education about TCP/IP, IPv4 shortages,
 
-  and of course, NAT devices that suffer from horrible user interface design.
 
- [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAT_Port_Mapping_Protocol
 
- [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Plug_and_Play
 
 
  |