Explorar el Código

make sure, when we're checking if we have enough dir info, that
we actually have the descriptor listed in the consensus, not just
any descriptor, for each relay.

don't backport this patch (yet); who knows what it might do.


svn:r14971

Roger Dingledine hace 17 años
padre
commit
b65b89d50f
Se han modificado 1 ficheros con 7 adiciones y 4 borrados
  1. 7 4
      src/or/routerlist.c

+ 7 - 4
src/or/routerlist.c

@@ -4194,6 +4194,7 @@ update_router_have_minimum_dir_info(void)
   int res;
   or_options_t *options = get_options();
   routerinfo_t *ri;
+  signed_descriptor_t *sd;
   const networkstatus_t *consensus =
     networkstatus_get_reasonably_live_consensus(now);
 
@@ -4220,10 +4221,12 @@ update_router_have_minimum_dir_info(void)
      {
        if (client_would_use_router(rs, now, options)) {
          ++num_usable; /* the consensus says we want it. */
-         /* XXX021 shouldn't we look up by descriptor digest? */
-         ri = router_get_by_digest(rs->identity_digest);
-         if (ri) {
-           ++num_present; /* we have some descriptor for it. */
+         if ((sd = router_get_by_descriptor_digest(rs->descriptor_digest)) &&
+             (ri = router_get_by_digest(rs->identity_digest)) &&
+             !memcmp(ri->cache_info.signed_descriptor_digest,
+                     sd->signed_descriptor_digest, DIGEST_LEN)) {
+           /* we have the descriptor listed in the consensus. */
+           ++num_present;
            if (ri->is_running)
              ++num_running; /* our local status says it's still up. */
          }