浏览代码

make sure, when we're checking if we have enough dir info, that
we actually have the descriptor listed in the consensus, not just
any descriptor, for each relay.

don't backport this patch (yet); who knows what it might do.


svn:r14971

Roger Dingledine 17 年之前
父节点
当前提交
b65b89d50f
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 7 次插入4 次删除
  1. 7 4
      src/or/routerlist.c

+ 7 - 4
src/or/routerlist.c

@@ -4194,6 +4194,7 @@ update_router_have_minimum_dir_info(void)
   int res;
   or_options_t *options = get_options();
   routerinfo_t *ri;
+  signed_descriptor_t *sd;
   const networkstatus_t *consensus =
     networkstatus_get_reasonably_live_consensus(now);
 
@@ -4220,10 +4221,12 @@ update_router_have_minimum_dir_info(void)
      {
        if (client_would_use_router(rs, now, options)) {
          ++num_usable; /* the consensus says we want it. */
-         /* XXX021 shouldn't we look up by descriptor digest? */
-         ri = router_get_by_digest(rs->identity_digest);
-         if (ri) {
-           ++num_present; /* we have some descriptor for it. */
+         if ((sd = router_get_by_descriptor_digest(rs->descriptor_digest)) &&
+             (ri = router_get_by_digest(rs->identity_digest)) &&
+             !memcmp(ri->cache_info.signed_descriptor_digest,
+                     sd->signed_descriptor_digest, DIGEST_LEN)) {
+           /* we have the descriptor listed in the consensus. */
+           ++num_present;
            if (ri->is_running)
              ++num_running; /* our local status says it's still up. */
          }